Stein theory is a Theory of Everything. It unifies all known forces via a single particle based on simple interactions of a small disk I call the Stein (after Einstein). Steins are slightly over 4fm across and effectively zero thickness. They only interact when they point at each other and then their spin vectors at every point of overlap determine the resultant effect.
Stein Theory agrees with all confirmed observations but has no fields, no quarks, and no need for any quantum theory, but it can demonstrate that some quantum equations are essentailly a statistic overview of many underlying deterministic interactions. Schrodinger’s wave equation for the electron and Maxwell’ equations for example.
It matches or beats QED (Quantum electrodynamics) on its most famous achievements such as precision derivation of the electron’s g-2 magnetic moment anomaly, and the fine structure constant, but Stein Theory can derive the fine structure constant and Planck’s constant to 64 significant digits and more, showing an exact series for both by deriving them from first principles. QED can’t do that.
Stein Theory has already solved a great many ‘mysteries’ across science and got rid of a a lot of contradictions and errors in standard model physics that are normally swept under the carpet (such as that relativity fails at nuclear level), that quantum theory simultaneously treats nucleons as points and volumes big enough to hold quarks), that the Compton effect requires that a photon somehow disappears and then reappears with different energy on collision with particles, but those particles cannot by its own rules absorb or emit a photon. Very many such problems infest modern physics, but it is only when you try to create a better alternative that you would ever become aware of them – unsurprisingly, they are very rarely mentioned!
In my comparisons with standard model physics, I often use the stories of the Emperor’s New Clothes to explain that scientists and academics exist in a conspiracy of silence, never mentioning the many problems they must surely know are there, lest they lose their grants and courtier status.
Fairy rings offer an excellent analogy for stein theory versus quantum theory – the rings are very easy to explain using nutrient depletion, but far more elaborate stories involving fairies can also explain them, describing in great and highly impressive detail their customers, rituals and culture and how they produce the rings. There could be fairies, and standard model physics and quantum theory could be right, but clear thinking and logical reasoning appeal to me far more. I simply do not possess enough faith to believe in current physics. It belongs in the bin and my books and papers using Stein Theory already replacement physics across large swathes of science.
That’s also why you won’t find my papers published apart from on my own pages. To pass a peer review, it would by necessity be done by those who believe in those fairies and make a fuss of the Emperor in his new clothes. Of course they could never publicly accept that they have been wrong all these years.
So on one side, we have existing physics, huge, sprawling, full of detail, curve fitting and mathematical flourish and lots of smoke and mirrors, packed full of errors, contradictions and mysteries, and on the other side, we have Stein Theory, which is far smaller, but nevertheless manages to explain a great deal more, correctly, and without the fairy stories.
The main theory volume is here (free):
https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=3iECEgAAQBAJ
and it’s already clear that some people do not like the Emperor’s invisible attire being criticised.
